Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (Alibaba) was released on Apr 14, 2026. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #99 out of 267 models, with 144.11.
Where Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B has published results on 12 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Jul 18, 2025 and Jul 13, 2026 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.
Where it stands out
Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.
It is not in the top third of its generation on any test with 6 or more models compared.
Where it falls behind
Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.
See all 12 tests, one by one
| Test | Score | In its generation | Overall | Test record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.8% | #41 / 67 (tied with 1) | #68 / 173 | 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon |
| AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) | 86.7% | #38 / 67 (tied with 4) | #66 / 168 | 100.0% GPT-5.5 |
| Dtbench | 73.9% | #58 / 65 | #87 / 148 | 98.9% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Lmca | 29.70 | #46 / 63 | #72 / 121 | 68.23 Claude Opus 5.5 |
| CritPt | 0.3% | #47 / 55 (tied with 3) | #84 / 112 | 32.3% GPT-5.6 Sol |
| WeirdML | 34.5% | #56 / 57 | #87 / 112 | 93.6% GPT-6 Astra |
| SciCode | 36.6% | #45 / 51 | #85 / 104 | 66.9% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Frontiermath Tiers 1 3 V2 | 20.4% | #40 / 45 | #72 / 86 | 93.7% GPT-6 Astra |
| WebDev Arena | 1,250 | #51 / 53 | #79 / 82 | 1,820 Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Game puzzles | 22.0% | #16 / 42 (tied with 1) | #39 / 77 | 84.0% GPT-6 Astra |
| Terminal-Bench | 24.6% | #26 / 31 | #28 / 33 | 84.7% GPT-5.5 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 44.4% | #14 / 18 | #19 / 24 | 95.0% Claude Fable 5 |
For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.
What to compare Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B with
The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.
| Model | Lab | ECI | ELO | LiveBench | Release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Google DeepMind | 145.15 | 1,467 | 63.9 | Jul 21, 2026 |
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | DeepSeek | 144.97 | 1,461 | n/a | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | 144.47 | 1,460 | n/a | Mar 3, 2026 | |
| Grok 4 Fast | xAI | 144.19 | 1,437 | n/a | Sep 19, 2025 |
| Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B | Alibaba | 144.11 | n/a | n/a | Apr 14, 2026 |
| Claude Opus 4.1 | Anthropic | 144.09 | 1,479 | n/a | Aug 5, 2025 |
| GLM-4.7 | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | 143.79 | 1,495 | n/a | Dec 22, 2025 |
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B or Claude Opus 4.1?
Claude Opus 4.1 is the model from another lab closest to Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B in capability. Across the 9 tests both took, this is the score:
| Test | Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B | Claude Opus 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Frontiermath Tiers 1 3 V2 | 20.4% | 12.6% |
| Terminal-Bench | 24.6% | 38.0% |
| WeirdML | 34.5% | 45.9% |
| AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) | 86.7% | 68.9% |
| Lmca | 29.70 | 37.08 |
| WebDev Arena | 1,250 | 1,389 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.8% | 77.3% |
| Dtbench | 73.9% | 80.0% |
| Game puzzles | 22.0% | 21.0% |
Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.
Other models from Alibaba
The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.
| Model | Release | ECI | ELO | LiveBench | Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7-Plus | Jun 2, 2026 | 147.30 | 1,510 | n/a | API access |
| Qwen3.7-Max | May 19, 2026 | 153.83 | 1,530 | 73.1 | API access |
| Qwen 3.6 Flash | Apr 27, 2026 | 143.05 | n/a | n/a | Unknown |
| Qwen3.6 27B | Apr 22, 2026 | 146.48 | n/a | 64.0 | Open weights (unrestricted) |
| Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) | Apr 20, 2026 | 149.24 | 1,488 | n/a | Unknown |
| Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B | Apr 14, 2026 | 144.11 | n/a | n/a | Open weights (unrestricted) |
| Qwen 3.6 Plus | Mar 31, 2026 | 147.49 | 1,476 | 68.9 | API access |
| Qwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B) | Feb 25, 2026 | 143.77 | 1,446 | n/a | Unknown |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Feb 24, 2026 | 146.26 | 1,466 | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
Have you used Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B? Rate it
Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.
What people ask about Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
Where does Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B rank among AI models?
In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B ranks #99 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 144.11. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.
Is Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B better than Claude Opus 4.1?
Across the 9 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B comes out ahead on 4, behind on 5 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.
Where do the numbers on this page come from?
From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.
Where each number comes from
Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.
The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.
LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.
← See the full ranking