Gemma 4 26B A4B
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google DeepMind) was released on Apr 2, 2026. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #115 out of 267 models, with 141.81. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 1,495 ELO points (#57).
Where Gemma 4 26B A4B stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers
Gemma 4 26B A4B has published results on 9 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Jul 6, 2025 and Jul 1, 2026 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.
Where it stands out
Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.
It is not in the top third of its generation on any test with 6 or more models compared.
Where it falls behind
Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.
See all 9 tests, one by one
| Test | Score | In its generation | Overall | Test record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | #57 / 64 | #98 / 173 | 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon |
| AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) | 82.2% | #46 / 64 (tied with 1) | #81 / 168 | 100.0% GPT-5.5 |
| Dtbench | 74.9% | #52 / 60 | #85 / 148 | 98.9% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Lmca | 29.68 | #42 / 58 | #73 / 121 | 68.23 Claude Opus 5.5 |
| CritPt | 0.0% | #46 / 50 (tied with 4) | #91 / 112 | 32.3% GPT-5.6 Sol |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | #52 / 54 | #86 / 112 | 93.6% GPT-6 Astra |
| SciCode | 40.0% | #36 / 46 | #77 / 104 | 66.9% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| ALE-Bench | 927 | #24 / 50 | #45 / 82 | 2,951 GPT-6 Astra |
| WebDev Arena | 1,361 | #40 / 49 | #72 / 82 | 1,820 Claude Opus 5.5 |
For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.
What to compare Gemma 4 26B A4B with
The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.
| Model | Lab | ECI | ELO | LiveBench | Release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3-Max-Instruct | Alibaba | 142.46 | n/a | n/a | Sep 24, 2025 |
| GPT-5.5 Instant | OpenAI | 142.45 | 1,456 | n/a | May 5, 2026 |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Anthropic | 142.40 | 1,454 | n/a | Oct 15, 2025 |
| Qwen3-Max | Alibaba | 142.34 | 1,478 | n/a | Sep 24, 2025 |
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | Google DeepMind | 141.81 | 1,495 | n/a | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | Mistral AI | 141.47 | 1,461 | n/a | Apr 28, 2026 |
| GLM-4.6 | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | 140.78 | 1,500 | n/a | Sep 30, 2025 |
Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the model from another lab closest to Gemma 4 26B A4B in capability. Across the 7 tests both took, this is the score:
| Test | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | 43.7% |
| ALE-Bench | 927 | 764 |
| Lmca | 29.68 | 26.06 |
| WebDev Arena | 1,361 | 1,265 |
| Dtbench | 74.9% | 75.5% |
| SciCode | 40.0% | 40.2% |
| CritPt | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.
Other models from Google DeepMind
The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.
| Model | Release | ECI | ELO | LiveBench | Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | Aug 13, 2026 | 157.22 | 1,551 | 78.8 | API access |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | Jul 21, 2026 | 154.24 | 1,530 | 73.6 | API access |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Jul 21, 2026 | 145.15 | 1,467 | 63.9 | API access |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | May 19, 2026 | 154.38 | 1,526 | 74.6 | API access |
| Gemma 4 31B IT | Apr 2, 2026 | 142.86 | n/a | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | Apr 2, 2026 | 141.81 | 1,495 | n/a | Open weights (unrestricted) |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | Feb 19, 2026 | 154.67 | 1,528 | 77.0 | API access |
| Gemini 3 Flash | Dec 17, 2025 | 151.80 | 1,511 | n/a | API access |
| Gemini 3 Pro | Nov 18, 2025 | 152.90 | 1,523 | n/a | API access |
Have you used Gemma 4 26B A4B? Rate it
Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.
What people ask about Gemma 4 26B A4B
Where does Gemma 4 26B A4B rank among AI models?
In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, Gemma 4 26B A4B ranks #115 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 141.81. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Across the 7 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, Gemma 4 26B A4B comes out ahead on 3, behind on 3 and tied on 1. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.
Where do the numbers on this page come from?
From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.
Where each number comes from
Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.
The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.
LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.
← See the full ranking