Home › AI Benchmark › Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic released on May 22, 2025 API access

Claude Sonnet 4

Claude Sonnet 4 (Anthropic) was released on May 22, 2025. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #116 out of 267 models, with 141.67. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 1,414 ELO points (#155). Against models of the same generation, its best result is on The Agent Company: 43.2%, #1 of 8.

#116 of 267 in the ECI ranking
141.67 ECI, the Epoch AI capability index
1,414 Arena ELO, human preference · #155
not measured LiveBench, overall average from 0 to 100
No votes yet. Rate it.
What the tests say

Where Claude Sonnet 4 stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers

Claude Sonnet 4 has published results on 29 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Aug 25, 2024 and Aug 20, 2025 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.

Where it stands out

Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.

The Agent Company43.2%
#1 of 8 in its generation · #3 of 14 overall
GPQA Diamond78.3%
#8 of 60 in its generation · #88 of 173 overall
SciCode40.0%
#5 of 23 in its generation · #77 of 104 overall
ARC-AGI 25.9%
#6 of 26 in its generation · #54 of 83 overall
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS)71.1%
#13 of 58 in its generation · #94 of 168 overall

Where it falls behind

Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.

GeoBench2,468
#18 of 18 in its generation · record: 4,333 (Gemini 3 Flash)
VPCT34.0%
#12 of 13 in its generation · record: 91.0% (Gemini 3 Pro)
FrontierMath tier 40.0%
#11 of 15 in its generation, tied with 4 · record: 39.6% (GPT-5.5 Pro)
Fiction.liveBench36.4%
#21 of 27 in its generation, tied with 1 · record: 100.0% (o3)
EnigmaEval3.1%
#11 of 17 in its generation · record: 39.3% (Claude Fable 5)
See all 29 tests, one by one
TestScoreIn its generationOverallTest record
GPQA Diamond 78.3% #8 / 60 #88 / 173 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 71.1% #13 / 58 #94 / 168 100.0% GPT-5.5
Dtbench 77.1% #11 / 46 #79 / 148 98.9% Claude Opus 5.5
Lmca 29.00 #9 / 36 #78 / 121 68.23 Claude Opus 5.5
CritPt 0.3% #9 / 26 (tied with 3) #84 / 112 32.3% GPT-5.6 Sol
WeirdML 46.1% #9 / 37 #55 / 112 93.6% GPT-6 Astra
SciCode 40.0% #5 / 23 #77 / 104 66.9% Claude Opus 5.5
ARC-AGI 2 5.9% #6 / 26 #54 / 83 95.0% GPT-6 Astra
ALE-Bench 655 #9 / 14 #66 / 82 2,951 GPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI 40.0% #8 / 25 #62 / 81 98.5% Claude Fable 5
SimpleBench 45.5% #8 / 27 #46 / 74 81.9% Claude Fable 5
MATH level 5 84.4% #17 / 43 #20 / 73 98.1% GPT-5
FrontierMath 4.1% #16 / 31 (tied with 1) #48 / 65 51.7% GPT-5.5
ForecastBench 60.20 #12 / 23 #24 / 62 62.50 o3
FrontierMath tier 4 0.0% #11 / 15 (tied with 4) #40 / 48 39.6% GPT-5.5 Pro
Hle 7.8% #10 / 18 #30 / 39 54.8% GPT-6 Astra
Aider Polyglot 61.30 #10 / 32 #12 / 38 88.00 GPT-5
Creative writing (Lech Mazur) 8.14 #10 / 34 #12 / 38 8.60 GPT-5
EnigmaEval 3.1% #11 / 17 #26 / 36 39.3% Claude Fable 5
Fiction.liveBench 36.4% #21 / 27 (tied with 1) #25 / 31 100.0% o3
METR: time horizon 74.94 #7 / 15 #15 / 29 719 Claude Opus 4.6
Gso 4.9% #4 / 9 #21 / 28 88.2% Claude Fable 5.1
DeepResearch Bench 46.6% #5 / 9 #13 / 24 55.3% Claude Opus 4.6
GeoBench 2,468 #18 / 18 #24 / 24 4,333 Gemini 3 Flash
VPCT 34.0% #12 / 13 #20 / 22 91.0% Gemini 3 Pro
Cybench 35.0% #4 / 10 #7 / 19 93.0% Claude Opus 4.6
The Agent Company 43.2% #1 / 8 #3 / 14 52.4% DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Os World 43.90 #1 / 4 #5 / 8 72.10 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Mindcube 44.8% #2 / 2 #2 / 2 46.7% Gemma 3 12B

For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.

Comparison

What to compare Claude Sonnet 4 with

The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.

ModelLabECIELOLiveBenchRelease
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep 2025) Google DeepMind 143.00 1,450 n/a Sep 25, 2025
Qwen3-Max-Instruct Alibaba 142.46 n/a n/a Sep 24, 2025
Qwen3-Max Alibaba 142.34 1,478 n/a Sep 24, 2025
o1 OpenAI 141.84 1,383 n/a Dec 17, 2024
Claude Sonnet 4 Anthropic 141.67 1,414 n/a May 22, 2025
DeepSeek-R1 (May 2025) DeepSeek 141.27 1,400 n/a May 28, 2025
GLM-4.6 Z.ai (Zhipu AI) 140.78 1,500 n/a Sep 30, 2025
Head to head

Claude Sonnet 4 or o1?

o1 is the model from another lab closest to Claude Sonnet 4 in capability. Across the 18 tests both took, this is the score:

Claude Sonnet 4 ahead on 8 o1 ahead on 10
Largest differences first
TestClaude Sonnet 4o1
Cybench 35.0% 10.0%
FrontierMath 4.1% 9.3%
METR: time horizon 74.94 38.83
EnigmaEval 3.1% 5.7%
GeoBench 2,468 3,925
Fiction.liveBench 36.4% 53.1%
ARC-AGI 40.0% 30.7%
Lmca 29.00 22.27
Creative writing (Lech Mazur) 8.14 7.02
MATH level 5 84.4% 94.7%

Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.

Cost per task

What Claude Sonnet 4 costs to deliver each task

Price per token is what is on the price sheet; cost per task is what lands on the invoice, because it depends on how many tokens the model spends. Each point is an effort level, published by whoever ran the test and compiled by Epoch AI. The further up and to the left, the more score per dollar.

ARC-AGI 2

The score scale does not start at zero.

1%2%4%5%7%US$ 0.13US$ 0.25US$ 0.37US$ 0.49cost per taskClaude Sonnet 4 · · 1.3% · US$ 0.13Claude Sonnet 4 · · 5.9% · US$ 0.49
Claude Sonnet 4

ARC-AGI

The score scale does not start at zero.

21%27%32%37%42%US$ 0.08US$ 0.18US$ 0.27US$ 0.37cost per taskClaude Sonnet 4 · · 23.8% · US$ 0.08Claude Sonnet 4 · · 40.0% · US$ 0.37
Claude Sonnet 4
Family

Other models from Anthropic

The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.

ModelReleaseECIELOLiveBenchAccess
Claude Opus 4.5 Nov 24, 2025 150.17 1,504 72.6 API access
Claude Haiku 4.5 Oct 15, 2025 142.40 1,454 n/a API access
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Sep 29, 2025 146.83 1,488 n/a API access
Claude Opus 4.1 Aug 5, 2025 144.09 1,479 n/a API access
Claude Opus 4 May 22, 2025 142.65 1,442 n/a API access
Claude Sonnet 4 May 22, 2025 141.67 1,414 n/a API access
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Feb 24, 2025 141.14 1,360 n/a API access
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) Oct 22, 2024 133.53 1,342 n/a API access
Claude 3.5 Haiku Oct 22, 2024 127.17 1,286 n/a API access
Your rating

Have you used Claude Sonnet 4? Rate it

n/a out of 5
no votes yet

Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.

Tap a star to vote.
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about Claude Sonnet 4

Where does Claude Sonnet 4 rank among AI models?

In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, Claude Sonnet 4 ranks #116 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 141.67. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.

Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than o1?

Across the 18 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, Claude Sonnet 4 comes out ahead on 8, behind on 10 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.

What is Claude Sonnet 4 best at?

Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of Claude Sonnet 4 are: The Agent Company (#1 of 8); GPQA Diamond (#8 of 60); SciCode (#5 of 23). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.

Sources

Where each number comes from

Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.

The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.

LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.

← See the full ranking